Emily Dickinson, “It is an honorable Thought” (946)

"It is an honorable Thought..." (946)
Emily Dickinson

It is an honorable Thought
And makes One lift One's Hat
As One met sudden Gentlefolk
Upon a daily Street

That We've immortal Place
Though Pyramids decay
And Kingdoms, like the Orchard
Flit Russetly away

Comment:

"It is an honorable Thought.... [t]hat We've immortal Place." Not a reasonable thought, nor one entirely braindead. This thought "makes One lift One's Hat / As One met sudden Gentlefolk:" "met" strikes suddenly - where is the "daily Street," exactly? Before "met," all the verbs are in the present tense. "Thought" as a noun, though, is the past of thinking. Is the "daily Street" the afterlife? The thought itself? A memory?

Perhaps all three, in a routine. I can't help but recall the opening of Yeats' "Easter 1916" in the first stanza, except I am loath to add "polite" and "meaningless" without just cause. There is a routine ("daily," "lift One's Hat"), but it is in response to "sudden Gentlefolk." What makes everyone else a Gentleman or Lady? The honorable "Thought" all have in their own heads: "sudden" and the repetition of "One" cast doubt on the existence of "We."

However, the "immortal Place" does exist for each of us, all at once (i.e. a hat covers the head, but we can all wear the same hat). "Thought" is contingent on "though:" we ignore the actual products of a previous "We" who gave honor to One. "Kingdoms" takes us away from the social in an earthly sense. These "Kingdoms" are "like the Orchard" - God's garden? Eden? - which certainly "Flit Russetly away." Russetly - like something reddish-brown, like an apple, but perhaps most relevantly: in a simple, homely way. We are all, ironically, Ladies and Gentlemen in this age - not the worst thing. A sudden recognition of another is better than none at all, even if well after the fact.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

2 Comments

  • Ashok,

    I like your analy­sis. I’m guilty of read­ing for reading’s sake and not really under­stand­ing what the poet is get­ting at.

    I wind up guess­ing wildly, hop­ing to shoe­horn the words into my perspective.

    Cheers,

    Mitch

  • You think about lit­er­a­ture far more deeply than I ever do. And poetry and I pre­fer to respect each other from a dis­tance. :)
    Beth Zimmerman´s last blog ..Send In the ClownsMy ComLuv Profile

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv Enabled