Monthly Archives: February 2010

Links, John Birch Society at CPAC Edition, 2/18/10

I fully understand that a part of politics is working with people that are less than sane. I know that people who sometimes work the hardest on campaigns are unhinged, to say the least. I know it might be the case that educated, thoughtful people can be very hateful and prone to vindictiveness and gossip,

Links, 2/17/10

From Megan McArdle, two links of note: “Did the Stimulus Save Us?” – from the article: There’s really very little question that the main mistake which created the Great Depression was allowing the banking system to collapse.  There were a number of reasons this happened, most notably horrific Federal Reserve policy and our insistence on

So How Worried Should Americans Be About Extremism?

Note: I’m still thinking through the issue, but my rough answer is that you should always take extremism seriously. Extremist talk that “doesn’t go anywhere” permits a myriad number of injustices to come about and institutionalize themselves. I think that’s self-evident: people focus too much on one “problem” to the detriment of all other concerns,

Rant: This “America is a Christian Nation” thesis is a load of crap, and potentially more dangerous than Birthers or Truthers

How Christian were the Founders? (nytimes, and they’re way more generous than I’m going to be; h/t LGF) I don’t want to spend too much time on this topic – the arguments for the Christianity of America as a whole depend on a lot of dishonesty and cherry-picking. I realize for those of you sympathetic

Links, 2/16/10

As you’re aware, the US is involved in a major operation in Helmand province, centered around the town of Marjah (h/t David for many of these links). The purpose seems to be to demonstrate a shadow government like the Taliban’s is no government at all, and to cut off the immense profits from the drug

Updated WordPress to 2.9.2, disabled plug-ins. Oh, and frustrated

A few of you will note this blog is not as functional as it was a few moments ago, because keeping WordPress up-to-date increasingly means dealing with plug-in incompatibility that causes my entire site to shut down. As much as I like WordPress, this is a pain that really has to end soon. I’m willing

Links, 2/15/10

Time Magazine’s “Seeking My Race-Based Valentine” has some information that’s eye-opening; the print edition includes a graphic with even more info. Following their lead, I went to OKCupid’s blog: “Your Race Affects Whether People Write You Back.” If you’re an Indian male, there’s a 20.8% chance that a woman you send a message on OKCupid

Valentine’s Day Complaining

A major theme of some posts of mine – see here, here, here – is how our conception of love changes because we grow up. Now it is not clear exactly how that concept changes and deepens, and we can argue until the end of time about that. But I think it is to be

Briefly Noted: Xenophon, “Art of Horsemanship”

The central chapter of the Memorabilia (III.3) tells of a conversation Socrates had with an unnamed cavalry commander. That commander was quite clueless how to do anything except make better horsemen (he didn’t know how to get them ready for war, whether or not he should check the condition of the horses, how to speak

Emily Dickinson, “Apology for Her” (852)

“Apology for Her” (852) Emily Dickinson Apology for Her Be rendered by the Bee – Herself, without a Parliament Apology for Me. Comment: It’s not hard to see “parle” and “parley” in “Parliament,” in addition to the one (“the Bee”/”Me”)/few (“Parliament”) distinction. The question is what one does with “speech” (parle) or “negotiating” (parley) or