A Quick Guide to Right-Wing Extremism on the Web

I'm not doing this to be preachy: anyone who reads this blog knows I say a lot of nutty things. But there's a difference between being nutty and spreading hate, inciting others to use the threat of violence and violence itself. I'm also aware that this list is inherently unfair - I'm not chronicling left-wing extremism here (and I do believe some of that has become "mainstream" in American politics), nor am I doing full justice to the root causes of these movements. I'm also not documenting all the movements, just a few that seem to be more legitimate and can take people in deceptively. Credit goes to Charles Johnson of LGF for many of the links below:

  • Ron Paul & Lew Rockwell (quote from "Angry White Man," in The New Republic): "Paul’s alliance with neo-Confederates helps explain the views his newsletters have long espoused on race. Take, for instance, a special issue of the Ron Paul Political Report, published in June 1992, dedicated to explaining the Los Angeles riots of that year. “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began,” read one typical passage."
  • Alex Jones (quote from John Hawkins at Right Wing News): "Jones is a self-promoting conspiracy nut. During the Bush Administration, he attacked Republicans and promoted oddball conspiracy theories about them (Bush was behind 9/11! They're going to put us all in camps!).... on his website right now is an article that seems to be suggesting that swine flu may have been concocted by the Bush Administration as part of a plan to implement martial law in the Obama Admin..."
  • American Thinker is one of the more prominent right-wing blogs proclaiming the President is not a citizen. A thorough debunking of the notion that the President's citizenship is questionable [link goes to The Daily Show, which finds ways to offend me even when exactly correct on this issue]
  • Free Republic - they were instrumental in creating the rage that caused the Clinton impeachment, and they were pretty crazy then. I do know a few people that use this site and are very good people (also problematic in a similar vein: World Net Daily). The site itself is crawling with some of the worst craziness imaginable. Candidates they like include Rep. Michele Bachmann (if this idiot can be elected, why am I not ruling at least a continent as an enlightened despot). It goes without saying that anyone who thinks Rep. Joe Wilson is a patriot should probably not be trusted on any issue [yes, I'm still a Republican after reading that last link. I don't quit because of some dumb crazies that should be marginalized].
  • Glenn Beck: lots of outright insanity; the Time magazine article discussing him is right on the money, the links to the John Birch society should not be ignored, nor the Skousen connection.
  • Michelle Malkin, Hot Air & Instapundit may look like they have standing on some issues, but the links to white supremacists should not be ignored. Instapundit and Hot Air can be implicated via association with one prominent right-wing blogger; Malkin has supported VDARE which isn't exactly subtle about how it conceives other races.
  • Powerline might be the worst offender nowadays, giving overt support to the vision of Gates of Vienna, Robert Spencer, Atlas Shrugged - their cause is nothing less than the return of fascism, BNP/Hitler style: they're using alarmist rhetoric about Muslims in Europe to advance this agenda.

If what I have listed doesn't make you sick, you have issues; please remember not to vote, and remember also to stay quiet in any and all situations: your voice has been heard, and it has resulted in what is documented above.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

15 Comments

  • […] This post was men­tioned on Twit­ter by Cheryl Jones. Cheryl Jones said: A Quick Guide to Right-Wing Extrem­ism on the Web http://bit.ly/toPpA […]

  • Sevad Strapotua wrote:

    Hi,

    I’m a jour­nal­ist, nat­u­rally scep­ti­cal and well-educated and yet the links you’ve posted about do not make me feel sick. I’ve been doing my own research and, whilst I don’t swal­low every­thing — or even most of it — I believe there is a grain of truth in what some right-wing peo­ple are say­ing. At the very least, it should make us vig­i­lant and pre­dis­pose us to take what­ever the Gov­ern­ment says with a pinch of salt.

    I find it hard to rec­on­cile your con­tempt for right wing com­men­ta­tors with your belief in the bible. Frankly, if you’re gullible enough to believe that the bible is any­thing other than a man-made fairy story, believ­ing what’s in the links above should be a piece of cake!

  • How’s the racism work­ing out for you, Sevad ?

  • Nice smear site you run here. Fre­quented by the like of Charles John­son, of Lit­tle Green Fas­cists (that’s a won­der­ful clone fac­tory you’re run­ning there, Chuckie~!).

    Where’s your look at the far-left sites that, for 8 solid years, bashed BOOOOOOOSH! to the detri­ment of our sol­diers in Iraq and Afghanistan?

    A mod­er­ate Repub­li­can, in these times, is a use­less Repub­li­can. We need con­ser­v­a­tives, the strength of the party, to lead the way. McCain’s been a fail­ure for decades; the likes of Peggy Noo­nan and Frum are weak links who pan­der to the left.

    Left or Right, make your choice. Cen­ter is not a side. I’m cer­tainly not on your side, what­ever ‘side’ that is.

  • WingnutWatch wrote:

    Serr8d is a well known wingnut freak who inhab­its swamps like Pro­tein Wis­dom and leaves troll­ish wingnutty com­ments all over the web– in case his extrem­ism isn’t already appar­ent from such com­ments as this:

    Left or Right, make your choice. Cen­ter is not a side.

    If you put the word “Not.” at the end of any­thing he’s ever said any­where, then you have a more reli­able guide to reality.

  • Dark_Falcon wrote:

    Sevad, you might try dump­ing the Christian-bashing. Not only did you insult me and most of Amer­ica, you also weaken your case with your knee-jerk reac­tion. You’re very wrong about the Bible and I hope you real­ize it someday.

  • Call out the right wing on their wack­y­ness and you get peo­ple call­ing Charles John­son ‘Chuckie’ as a defense.

    When you’re over the tar­get you get the most flak.

  • A Ninny Moose wrote:

    Wow. I guess this is one of the “CJ Approved” sites that allows com­ments from the Gulag Dwellers. Well played.

    Pretty soon, I expect you guys to be har­vest­ing the lima beans and don­ning the pur­ple sweatsuits.

  • Sevad Strapotua wrote:

    Dean: Racism? Sorry, I don’t fol­low your non-sequitur.

    Dark Fal­con: What makes you think it’s a knee-jerk reac­tion? You’re very wrong about the bible and I hope you realise it one day.

  • Sevad– hardly a non-sequitur. This was an arti­cle specif­i­cally about white suprema­cist ten­den­cies in today’s lead­ing right –wingers, then you state that “I believe there is a grain of truth in what some right-wing peo­ple are say­ing”. I don’t think I’m reach­ing to take your mean­ing to be there is some truth, or value, in their opin­ions. Sorry if that’s not the case.

  • Sevad Strapotua wrote:

    Dean,

    You need to read the arti­cle again. It’s about right-wing extrem­ism, not specif­i­cally white suprema­cists. There is an ele­ment of white supremacy in one or two of the links but there is plenty of other stuff that has noth­ing to do with that. You seem to have auto­mat­i­cally assumed that I am in agree­ment with the white suprema­cists. You’re free to jump to what­ever con­clu­sions you like. Just don’t expect me to make the leap with you.

  • Extrem­ism on both sides is wrong, You can be on a side with out being on the lunatic Fringe.

  • @ David — agreed. I didn’t write this post because I wanted to be preachy: some of the things peo­ple are up to are quite frankly dan­ger­ous, and it needs to be stopped before it gets worse.

    There are lots of ways to be an oppo­si­tion party, and I know I’ve been clear I’m no fan of Demo­c­ra­tic poli­cies, and I do sup­port GOP can­di­dates with dol­lars and words.

    But this is ridicu­lous: I can’t excuse a US Rep­re­sen­ta­tive say­ing that the cen­sus could be a plan to round us up and put us in camps.

  • […] presents A Quick Guide to Right-Wing Extrem­ism on the Web posted at Rethink.. Hmm..guess I have issues given some of the names on your list.  I think some […]

  • None of the Above wrote:

    Demo­c­rat = Repub­li­can = Big Government

    But it is nice to think you have a choice, though. But you do have a choice, of course: Heads or Tails? Flip sides of the same coin is still the same coin.

    The only dif­fer­ence is the rhetoric, not the actions.

    But at least that give some­thing for sleeple to argue about.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv Enabled