A Waste of Resources: The GOP’s New “Republican for a Reason” Site

"Republican for a Reason" - Just look at it and you'll see my main complaint. Does anything about that site's garish design, needing to make an account, and focus on utterly worthless issues (candidates don't read the party platforms) appeal to you? Do you really want to go there and post in the forums and be heard by people you don't know and don't really care to know?

If the GOP wants to hear from the grassroots, they'll tear down that site, and just put up a blog where they link to various blogposts they agree with or think are thoughtful from around the web. The grassroots is saying plenty already, and the GOP can issue disclaimers saying that they only consider the various posts thoughtful, and they don't necessarily agree with the content or all of the author's other work.

Imagine how much buzz that blog would create in a matter of seconds. It would bring together a lot of right-wing bloggers that are a very loose network right now, and get their audiences to meet each other in earnest. Then activism could begin with a scope hitherto unrealized: remember, there were 47 million votes for McCain.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

19 Comments

  • What a pos web­site. It looks hor­rid and the inter­face is garbage– It took 5 clicks to get to where there should have been a forum, but instead I kept get­ting a mes­sage that there were no com­ments today. Why would any­body set up their mes­sage board like this?

    That is not even to men­tion how can you pos­si­bly have a grass­roots any­thing started by the party chair?? This guy’s name has been on annoy­ing emails in my inbox for years. It’s just… imper­sonal and useless.

  • Yet another glar­ing exam­ple of how the GOP just doesn’t “get it” when it comes to har­ness­ing the power of the web. A com­plete waste of time (and it brings me no plea­sure to say that).

    They had bet­ter start get­ting them­selves together pronto and address­ing why 66% of vot­ers under 30 voted Demo­c­ra­tic. The GOP can’t afford to lose an entire generation.

    RHM

  • @ RHM — I know what they’re try­ing to do, which is avoid neg­a­tive pub­lic­ity at all costs.

    Prob­lem: if you go look at who’s talk­ing in the forums, it’s wingnuts rul­ing the fray.

    @ Amanda: I really think there should be a weekly e-mail newslet­ter at MOST. Any­thing more is spam, and the point of the newslet­ter is just to let you know what’s going on at the site.

    I do think it’s a good thing the party chair said some­thing. That state­ment had some class — a lot of the peo­ple I’m deal­ing with online want to argue the elec­tion was stolen blah blah and it helps to have a chair be acces­si­ble but at the same time fairly firm. I liked that lit­tle open­ing statement.

    But yeah. This is an awful web strat­egy. If I did what they’re doing with my blog, I’d have no hits.

  • I didn’t know whether to sign up or buy a stamp… com­plete waste of time agreed. Right wingers are too “indi­vid­u­al­ist” in their think­ing, stuff like this will never work. My opin­ion only…

    The group­think works for left­ist because they are wired that way… Our simpe solu­tion is to get rid of those RINO’s who stum­ble over them­selves to appear bi=partisan and like the catch phrase “reached across the aisle”

    its always us expected to com­pro­mise.…. any one else sick of it?

    our solu­tion is to sim­ply talk to those we know, make sure they are aware of the truth behind the issues and the long term effects of them and replace the entire repub­li­can party machine with some­ht­ing else… I don’t know what, but in the mean­time, daily emails and faxes to your reps threat­e­ni­ung their job is a good start.… you don’t need a stu­pid webb­site to do that.….

  • I won­der what soft­ware that is. They might have used some­thing like ning.com for bet­ter features.

  • @ Click­fire: You’re more immersed in web strat­egy and design than I. I’m argu­ing from a prin­ci­ple that you want things as open as pos­si­ble, and that “link love” dri­ves the net.

    What could they do with what they have now that would improve it?

    I think it should just be torn down. We’re hav­ing a bet­ter con­ver­sa­tion on this blog about how the GOP could attract vot­ers right now.

    @ Buf­foon — like the blog! Am link­ing back to you pronto.

  • @ ashok
    lit­tle hint about blog rolls, they’re cool and all but are not Tech­no­rati rank friendly, you leak a lot of rankage..

    I recently did away with mine, but thanks..

    back to the point„, your exactly right, and I don’t have to sup[ply you with six addresses and four phone num­bers etc just to say hello…sheesh… its an email col­lec­tor to solicit money from us all that’s it…

    I’ve net a few of the guys behind some of these “new media: type things„,a bunch of holier than though col­lege asshats…

    thanks for the ning tip clickfire.…..I’ll check it out later, I’ve been look­ing for a “dis­cus­sion panel type thingy to use…

  • Ashok on point again…I could not agree more. Talk, talk talk, and no lis­ten­ing, and they are decades behind. New blood is needed at the RNC.

    I have seen a few con­ser­v­a­tive shows…Huckabee…can’t hack it!

  • haha­ha­ha­haha

    the one thing i have to say about republicans…you guys suck at try­ing to be/look cool and that site is a good exam­ple. it just isn’t work­ing. but you are right…they need to cut the crap and get to the point. which is what politi­cians don’t do…ever…

  • as i read every­one else’s comments…i’ll add some­thing else.

    it’s not that the repub­li­can party has wrong ideas (ok well…maybe…but i’ll give you the ben­e­fit of the doubt for now), it’s that they, in gen­eral, can­not appeal to the younger gen­er­a­tion. the repub­li­can party needs to step up like the demo­c­ra­tic party just did. youth­ful lead­er­ship is not always a bad thing in either party. while expe­ri­ence is a plus, the younger gen­er­a­tion has become increas­ingly apa­thetic about pol­i­tics due to the sharp divide between gen­er­a­tions at this point. the repub­li­can party sim­ply doesn’t speak to many young peo­ple. their lack of know-how about how this age group uses the inter­net is one huge aspect. hope­fully they’ll real­ize this before they do lose a whole gen­er­a­tion of voters.

    i’m all for repub­li­cans (though i pre­fer democ­rats) as long as they let me keep my basic free­doms. i include the right to choose and the right to marry the one you love. in tra­di­tional repub­li­can thought of less gov­ern­ment and more free­dom would ulti­mately sup­port these ideals. your reli­gion can con­demn it but the gov­ern­ment should not unless they place some sort of threat to democ­racy and other people’s freedom.

    ok…done ram­bling.

  • The con­ser­v­a­tive mes­sage is not wrong, smaller gov­ern­ment, lower taxes, free enter­prise! It is the way they are try­ing to express it that is wrong.

  • Okay, so I’m the sole voice in sup­port of the effort. I don’t know about the site, but I joined the Face­book Group. Here’s why I don’t think it’s a waste of time. The GOP got it’s a** handed to us with the younger demos and those who get their infor­ma­tion on line. Are there amaz­ing con­ser­v­a­tive blog­ger voices, that are cur­rently being ignored..YES. But how do you con­vey the solid ideas you have, if No one is lis­ten­ing? Or as in our case, you are always preach­ing to the choir? On the face­book group you can Post links, a per­fect place for blog­gers to pro­mote their ideas and site to every­one in the group.
    Do I think it will solve all the prob­lems? No. But you’ve got to start somewhere.

  • @ Biased Girl — Like your site! Link­ing to you in the blogroll.

    The Face­book group I have no prob­lem with. The argu­ment here is directed at that site.

    I’m not argu­ing with the “effort,” except for the fact that I feel it was so poorly done it’s insult­ing. The site’s a pretty bla­tant attempt to grab your e-mail address.

  • Thanks for the add! I under­stand your frus­tra­tion at the clum­si­ness of the e-mail grab, but some­times you have to be bla­tant. You can’t get more obvi­ous than what Obama ran on his site, yet peo­ple joined and accepted those e-mails, and made (at least some) of the donations.…

  • @ Biased Girl — the argu­ment isn’t just that the site is hor­ri­ble. The whole strat­egy makes no sense. Let’s make the best case for it:

    - it gets peo­ple think­ing like they’re insiders.

    - it gets them on a super­vised forum where they can’t say insane things (this, btw, is already fail­ing as a goal)

    - it gets their e-mails and phone num­bers so they can be hit up for cash

    - it doesn’t say any­thing about the party that other peo­ple aren’t already say­ing. It is “grass­roots” in the sense no direc­tion is given.

    That’s the best case for this site. Here’s the case against it.

    1. The web doesn’t work like this: notice how any right-wing blog­ger or site of note took off. Michelle Malkin allows track­backs — lesser known blog­gers meet each other through her site all the time. Peo­ple net­work through LGF. The Pow­er­line guys reach out through print and web­casts and a mil­lion other things, as well as break sto­ries. Instapun­dit gives tons of links to any and every­thing he finds interesting.

    This site fails to engage the web.

    2. It fails at edu­cat­ing the base. You know what? I’d like to learn from peo­ple like Sen. McCain what life was like in the Sen­ate, and how his per­cep­tions going in dif­fer from his knowl­edge now. There’s no sense that any­one at this site has any cred­i­bil­ity. Where’s the seri­ous con­tent, that tells me not just what the party’s about, but what it’s done? You can’t just dis­own the past of the party because you lost an election.

    3. It encour­ages the worst sort of pop­ulism. Peo­ple are already on the site froth­ing at the mouth. No one needs to spell prop­erly, let alone write any­thing coher­ent. If this site takes off, it’s more dan­ger­ous than if it fails: it would be scream­ing that the Amer­i­can peo­ple are noth­ing but a wal­let to be tapped.

    Again, you’re not tak­ing seri­ously just how much is already out there, and how good much of it is. An entire alter­na­tive con­ser­v­a­tive media exists — the grass­roots have been vocal for years, and there are artic­u­late voices among them.

    The GOP needs to be invit­ing by hav­ing a dis­tinct voice of its own, not just by being a facil­i­ta­tor. The best thing about that crappy site is the wel­come mes­sage, where the Chair­man con­cedes the elec­tion. There are quite a few peo­ple online who are busy froth­ing at the mouth over that “birth cer­tifi­cate” non­sense, and if you don’t know what that issue is, great. Part of that dis­tinct voice is rea­son­ably engag­ing other voices, not just let­ting peo­ple shout. The GOP should show its aware of things like Malkin and LGF and Paja­mas Media, and that it wel­comes read­ers of those things to weigh in on can­di­dates and be active in party build­ing locally.

    Obama’s site isn’t what won him the web. Kos did that years before.

  • If their going to go for the email grab.…they should make you want to give the email. Some­thing entic­ing, like want a smaller less intru­sive gov­ern­ment, find out how to cre­ate one here.….ya know??

  • Hi,Im from Aus­tralia and from my per­spec­tive the GOP has become a hold­ing tank and breed­ing ground for psycho-paths—as in neo-psychopath (“con­ser­v­a­tive”). Espe­cially the sex para­noid “reli­gious” cra­zies as per James Dobson.

    And try as you may there is noth­ing you can do to make a cess pool of rant­ing drool­ing cra­zies look attractive.

    Put in another way. What­ever virtue the GOP may have once had (which is of course debat­able too),the GOP has BECOME the man­i­fes­ta­tion of all the inher­ently toxic aspects of the col­lec­tive shadow of the col­lec­tive USA psychic.

  • Sue, Wow! What an open mind peo­ple in Aus­tralia must have!
    Your last sen­tence really gives credit to the Aus­tralian edu­ca­tion sys­tem by the way.

    I love when peo­ple from another nation, usu­ally a nation that is incred­i­bly far along the path towards a full blown fas­cist state, try and lec­ture us AMer­i­cans, rather us CONSERVATIVE Amer­i­cans, about how intol­er­ant and arro­gant we are. It’s as if they in no way share the guilt of the sins of their fathers.

  • I think your idea of a GOP blog that is a plat­form for state­ments of sup­port or or oppo­si­tion to the greater Repub­li­can blogosphere-at-large’s posts is excel­lent one! When will you be start­ing it?

    :)

    Jane Q.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv Enabled