<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Stupendous Fabrics:” Notes on Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/</link>
	<description>On Poetry, Politics and Philosophy - A Sketch, An Intersection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miklos Hollender</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>Miklos Hollender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=440#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>You, Sir, are the next Edmund Burke or Giambattista Vico. Or at least the next Theodore Dalrymple. This post is simply amazing. Very well thought out.

Start writing books or at least publishing to the City Journal or The Salisbury Review. Or at the very least publishing to http://culture11.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/

Just one minor disagreement. Do empires always increase the ego of their citizens? Cannot empires be... holy? (Not in the strictly religious sense of it.) 

Alain de Benoist has some interesting arguments for  the idea of an empire, as opposed to the idea of a nation: http://es.geocities.com/sucellus23/telos6.htm

(Though it a bit smells like big-ego Evola-ist posturing to me, there could be some truths in it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You, Sir, are the next Edmund Burke or Giambattista Vico. Or at least the next Theodore Dalrymple. This post is simply amazing. Very well thought out.</p>
<p>Start writing books or at least publishing to the City Journal or The Salisbury Review. Or at the very least publishing to <a href="http://culture11.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/">http://culture11.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/</a></p>
<p>Just one minor disagreement. Do empires always increase the ego of their citizens? Cannot empires be… holy? (Not in the strictly religious sense of it.) </p>
<p>Alain de Benoist has some interesting arguments for  the idea of an empire, as opposed to the idea of a nation: <a href="http://es.geocities.com/sucellus23/telos6.htm">http://es.geocities.com/sucellus23/telos6.htm</a></p>
<p>(Though it a bit smells like big-ego Evola-ist posturing to me, there could be some truths in it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hostile States &#171; Right Wing Chicks</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/comment-page-1/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>Hostile States &#171; Right Wing Chicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=440#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is a great link to an outline for Letter 9 &#8220;Stupendous Fabrics:&#8221; Notes on Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Here is a great link to an outline for Letter 9 “Stupendous Fabrics:” Notes on Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 9 […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Inaugural BoBo Carnival of Politics - Sep 7, 2008 &#124; Driving the Left Loony -The Bobo Files</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>The Inaugural BoBo Carnival of Politics - Sep 7, 2008 &#124; Driving the Left Loony -The Bobo Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=440#comment-717</guid>
		<description>[...] presents &#8220;Stupendous Fabrics:&#8221; Notes on Alexander Hamilton&#8217;s Federalist No. 9 posted at Rethink., saying, &#8220;Just a summary and some notes on a fairly important aspect of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] presents “Stupendous Fabrics:” Notes on Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 9 posted at Rethink., saying, “Just a summary and some notes on a fairly important aspect of […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The BoBo Carnival of Politics Sep 7, 2008 &#124; The BoBo Files</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>The BoBo Carnival of Politics Sep 7, 2008 &#124; The BoBo Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=440#comment-713</guid>
		<description>[...] presents &#8220;Stupendous Fabrics:&#8221; Notes on Alexander Hamilton&#8217;s Federalist No. 9 posted at Rethink., saying, &#8220;Just a summary and some notes on a fairly important aspect of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] presents “Stupendous Fabrics:” Notes on Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 9 posted at Rethink., saying, “Just a summary and some notes on a fairly important aspect of […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=440#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I like Hamilton and Madison a lot.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Arguments for states&#039; rights and rights generally are probably best constructed from Jefferson, or from the idea of moderation I&#039;ve talked about above. I&#039;m not saying that sort of rhetoric is wrong, just more like you don&#039;t really want to reduce things to a power-logic if you want to get past the Constitution&#039;s reasoning.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Note also that there is a &quot;moderation&quot; of a sorts when all is said and done: we are not as volatile a people as the states were during the Articles of Confederation, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Hamilton and Madison a lot.</p>
<p>Arguments for states’ rights and rights generally are probably best constructed from Jefferson, or from the idea of moderation I’ve talked about above. I’m not saying that sort of rhetoric is wrong, just more like you don’t really want to reduce things to a power-logic if you want to get past the Constitution’s reasoning.</p>
<p>Note also that there is a “moderation” of a sorts when all is said and done: we are not as volatile a people as the states were during the Articles of Confederation, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DD877</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2008/01/stupendous-fabrics-notes-on-alexander-hamiltons-federalist-no-9/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>DD877</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=440#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Well that certainly allows some rethinking. Probably why there is a second amendment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that certainly allows some rethinking. Probably why there is a second amendment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.480 seconds -->
