<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Politics Reducible to Rhetoric?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ashokkarra.com/2007/02/is-politics-reducible-to-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2007/02/is-politics-reducible-to-rhetoric/</link>
	<description>On Poetry, Politics and Philosophy - A Sketch, An Intersection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gracchi</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2007/02/is-politics-reducible-to-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Gracchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=110#comment-131</guid>
		<description>What do you make of the idea of policy say in the Taciteans at the end of the 16th century as against law? Their argument was that policy was a descriptive term for actions that a King took when the law was inadequate to provide for the state- in a sense the American revolution and certain of the democrat critiques say of the Patriot Act are critiques of policy from the standpoint of law- that&#039;s not to say they are right. But is that a useful conceptual distinction to employ.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I must go back to the City and the Man- I read it very quickly last year for a reading group but never really grappled with it properly. I&#039;ve been prejudiced against Strauss by reading lots of Quentin Skinner unfortunately!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Despite my ignorance of Strauss I&#039;m trying to work out some of the topics you&#039;ve looked at here on my own blog... I&#039;ll link back to you so hopefully you&#039;ll see a technorati track back but I think this relationship between reason and rhetoric is interesting. What by the way do you make of Mandeville and Vico and their theory of state creation in this context- M holds I think that states were created by a wise statesman, Vico by father/priest figures? There is a sort of rhetorical power latent within the Machiavellian idea of virtu as well. Sorry long comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you make of the idea of policy say in the Taciteans at the end of the 16th century as against law? Their argument was that policy was a descriptive term for actions that a King took when the law was inadequate to provide for the state- in a sense the American revolution and certain of the democrat critiques say of the Patriot Act are critiques of policy from the standpoint of law- that&#8217;s not to say they are right. But is that a useful conceptual distinction to employ.</p>
<p>I must go back to the City and the Man- I read it very quickly last year for a reading group but never really grappled with it properly. I&#8217;ve been prejudiced against Strauss by reading lots of Quentin Skinner unfortunately!</p>
<p>Despite my ignorance of Strauss I&#8217;m trying to work out some of the topics you&#8217;ve looked at here on my own blog&#8230; I&#8217;ll link back to you so hopefully you&#8217;ll see a technorati track back but I think this relationship between reason and rhetoric is interesting. What by the way do you make of Mandeville and Vico and their theory of state creation in this context- M holds I think that states were created by a wise statesman, Vico by father/priest figures? There is a sort of rhetorical power latent within the Machiavellian idea of virtu as well. Sorry long comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The SJ Libertine</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2007/02/is-politics-reducible-to-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>The SJ Libertine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=110#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll look at this more fully as soon as I&#039;m done this pot of coffee and a therapeutic soak in the tub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look at this more fully as soon as I&#8217;m done this pot of coffee and a therapeutic soak in the tub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ashokkarra.com/2007/02/is-politics-reducible-to-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ashokkarra.com/?p=110#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;ll be reading that over and over to see if I can fully grasp at what you&#039;re saying. Wow!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My weekend was good, sorry yours sucked. You&#039;ll see in a later post, I hope. I am glad you left a post. Reading the stupid is never fun, if you know what I mean....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;ll be reading that over and over to see if I can fully grasp at what you&#8217;re saying. Wow!</p>
<p>My weekend was good, sorry yours sucked. You&#8217;ll see in a later post, I hope. I am glad you left a post. Reading the stupid is never fun, if you know what I mean&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.345 seconds -->

